Tuesday, June 12, 2007

'Carnatic Chills'

Does the title seem familiar? Yeah, its a new fusion music album released by the violin maestroes Ganesh and Kumaresh. But no, this post doesnt have anything to do with that...

Nevertheless, Shruthibhedam I think is really one of those 'Carnatic Chills'...Its a concept that has intrigued me for so long now that I was tempted to try out a small aalaap incorporating the idea.

My undertanding of the concept:
(Much has been discussed about Shruthibhedam, among both Classical and Film Music lovers alike; Ilaiyaraja's music mostly being the subject matter for the latter :) Here is another such attempt by me to take up and deal with this in some detail. Given my limited knowledge,I'd be glad to have any inputs/corrections/clarifications.)

To avoid any confusion, I will refrain from using any terms from Western Classical Music and adhere to Carnatic terminologies.

Pre-requisites to understand Shruthibhedam:

1.Shruthi: A shruthi is defined uniquely by two distinct frequencies x and y (y>x)and their integral multiples, with a condition that the ratio y:x::3:2.
I.e., the frequency y is 3/2 times the frequency x. We give these frequencies x and y names, which are 'Shadjam' and 'Pachamam' respectively. (So since it is the shadjam that actually fixes a shruthi, it is called the "Adhaara Shadjam".) So, whether its 5 Hz and 7.5 Hz or 10 Hz and 15 Hz, it doesn't matter. Within any given pair x and (3/2)x, x will be Shadjam, and (3/2)x (or y), Panchamam.
What is to be carefully noted here, are the words 'within any given pair'. I.e., a frequency by itself cannot be called a Shadjam or Panchamam. It is only with respect to the other frequency in the pair that one can say that the particular frequency is Shadjam or Panchamam.
These are denoted in short by sa and pa respectively.
Now, given such a pair x and (3/2)x, all integral multiples of x will also be called Sa and all integral multiples of (3/2)x will also be called Pa.
Thus, a shruthi is uniquely defined by a series of frequencies x,(3/2)x, 2x,3x,4x,6x,8x..... where x, I emphasise, is a variable.
A shruthi is named by a number which corresponds to any sa (x,2x,4x and so on) convenient for performance by the human voice or any instrument. Let's call this convenient sa as the middle sa.
A middle Sa of 261.6 Hz is denoted by the number 1. The number notations for other frequences for the middle sa will be discussed eventually.

2.Sthaayi: A Sthaayi is defined by 3 frequencies x,(3/2)x and 2x.
So, x,(3/2)x and 2x form one sthaayi; 2x,3x and 4x form another sthaayi and so on.
If x is the middle Sa, then the set x,(3/2)x,2x form the 'Madhyama Sthaayi' ; the set
(1/2)x, (2/3)x,x form the 'Mandra Sthaayi'; and the set 2x,3x,4x form the 'Taara Sthaayi'.

3. Swara:Given a particular sa, we have so far only discussed about its corresponding sa and the other Sa's and Pa's; while (obviously) there can be a multitude of other frequencies.
It is largely agreed that the minimum ratio of two discernable frequencies should be 1.059.
So if we construct a geometric progression (GP) with x as the first term and 1.059 as the common ratio and compute upto the 13th term, we find that the 13th term is nothing but 2x.
So given an x which is the first term of the GP; like Sa and Pa, all the intermediate frequencies have particular names and these are called 'Swaras'. The nomenclature of the 12 frequencies as swaras are as below:
1st : Shadjam (sa)
2nd : Shuddha Rishabham (ri1)
3rd : Chaturshruthi Rishabham (ri2)or Shuddha Gandharam (ga1) in different cases.
4th : Shatshruthi Rishabham (ri3) or Sadharana Gandharam (ga2) in different cases.
5th : Anthara Gandharam (ga3)
6th : Shuddha Madhyamam (ma1)
7th : Prati Madhyamam (ma2)
8th : Panchamam
9th : Shuddha Daivatam (da1)
10th : Chaturshruthi Daivatam (da2) or Shuddha Nishadam (ni1) in different cases.
11th : Shatshruthi Daivatam (da3) or Kaishiki Nishadam (ni2) in different cases.
12th : Kaakali Nishadam (ni3)
13th : Shadjam (Sa)
Now going back to the number notations of Shrutis, a middle Sa corresponding to 1.059 times 261.6 Hz is denoted by 1.5; a middle Sa corresponding to 1.059^2 times 261.6 Hz is denoted by 2 and so on.
In other words, given a shruthi, if you want to go to the immediately next higher shruthi, you have to transpose the ri1 of this shruthi to sa and proceed to construct the geometric progression as usual. Taking the ri2 of the original shruthi as sa would give the 'next-to-next' shruthi and so on.
(Conventionally we denote swaras in mandra sthaayi with a "#" symbol and those in taara sthaayi with capital letters.)

4. Raga: A raga is a unique combination of a certain set of swaras in a certain pattern. The pattern of the swaras has to be defined for both ascent and descent of the swaras.
(Here I shall not dwell on the criteria for forming a raga.)
(Note: A raga is Sthaayi-independent.)
For example, the combination
sa ri2 ga3 ma1 pa da2 ni3 Sa; Sa ni3 da2 pa ma ga3 ri2 sa
forms the raga 'Shankarabharanam'.

Shruthibhedam :

It is to be borne in mind that cognizance/ interpretation of the shruthi of a piece is pivotal in determining its raga.
Hence, if we now retain the absolute frequencies of the above swaras, but decide to shift the sa to the present ri, i.e. make a 'bhedam' in the shruti, all the swaras change correspondingly.
So the above combination would now read:
ni#2 sa ri2 ga2 ma1 pa da2 ni2; ni da2 pa ma1 ga2 ri2 sa ni#2
(Obviously but importantly, this is possible only because the relative frequencies of successive swaras remain the same since they are in geometric progression)
Now this new combination forms the raga "Kharaharapriya".
Thus, a Shruthibhedam is said to happen when the shruthi is changed in a raga, resulting in a new raga.
The idea of Shrutibhedam has other interesting consequences too:
An entire song in a single raga can be percieved to be in one raga by one person and some other raga by another person, since it all depends on where the listener places her/his sa.
A classic example is Ilaiyaraja's andhi mazhai pozhugiradhu, which would be in raga Vasantha if one placed the starting swara of the song as ma, and Ramani if one placed the starting swara of the song as sa.
Now why is it that some people percieve it as Vasantha and some others as Ramani, and yet some others are able to pick both ragas with equal ease is a question I have not been able to answer. We would have to go into musical cognition processes for that, I'd imagine.
In other words, what is the criterion for deciding the shruthi (and equivalently the raga) of a song if it is not known to you beforehand?
And why/how is it that for a majority of songs (if the shruthi is not given), majority of people seem to find out the shruthi by some apriori ability, and also largely remain mutually consistent?
I wish to answer these questions some day!

Here is a small Alaap I did, in raga Sriranjani, with a transpose to Hamsanadam, and back to Sriranjani.
Sriranjani is defined by:
sa ri2 ga2 ma1 da2 ni2 Sa, same way back.
If the ga in the above is taken to be sa, and the Sa of the above omitted, we get,
ga2 ma1 da2 ni2 Ri2 Ga2, same way back.
This combination also corresponds to:
sa ri2 ma2 pa ni3 Sa, same way back, which is the raga Hamsanadam.
So when the {ga2 ma1 da2 ni2 Ri2 Ga2} phrase is repeatedly sung, with a stress on the ga so as to make it sound like the shadjam, what results is our perception of it as Hamsanadam.
Here it is:

--Ok, I really need to add here now that today, I'm really embarrassed by this piece :P I have to, have to, have to redo it. And really soon. Its perfectly ok if you've read the article and don't listen to this :P 02/09/2010 --


powered by ODEO

Do leave your feedback.

UPDATE as of Nov 2011: Since the player I'd embedded here doesn't work anymore (thankfully!) and also since I did this very transpose (Sriranjani to Hamsanadham) live at a recent concert, I'd like to redirect you to that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeO9kjk7aPg
Feedback as always would be much appreciated, thanks!


20 comments:

Ganesh said...

Sindhuja

Nice alap . I am no expert on ragas or carnatic but to me it sounded as Sriranjani.
Can you tell me where it transposes to Hamsanadham.

thanks

SUMI said...

Divine!
Very good write up too! Hope to see more classical pieces on your blog in the future.

Wokana said...

I have two comments :)

One, i loved the scientific explanation of the scales. It convinces me now that different civilizations could have come up with the same set of notes with no interaction.

Two,
Loved the aalap!!

Kiranz..!! said...

Sindhu,evenif am not having any idea bout classical music,it soundz really nice to me.Cool..!

Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam said...

Ganesh, its around 4:08, when you can also hear the background shruthi changing.
Sumi, Gautam, Kiran,thanks!

.:: ROSH ::. said...

Totally divine, loved the aalap. The write up was very informative. Do post more carnatic songs plz

Jo said...

Hey Sindhuja, eventhough I know nothing about Carnatic music, your aalaap sounds divine and soulful. Keep singing and post more informative stuff such as this. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Sindhu,

Beautiful article. Lot of people dont give much emphasis to Shruthi-sutham and swara sutham. Your Aalapanai was wonderful. Probably you should post a RTP of a specific ragam (thodi for eg..)

good luck!!

Srinath

Dhiraj said...

wonderful explanation of ragam swaram and sruthi and one nice bit of alapana at the end there really got hooked by it.

Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam said...

Thank you, each one of you for the positive feedback!

Aravind G said...

I liked your explanation and your style of writing kept me interested in your write-up till the last word. I am 'zero' on theory behind swaras and shruthis and I couldn't relate well with your aalaap. I guess, there is a certain level of prerequisite required to appreciate any aalaap. Anyway, I have bookmarked your page and keep writing more :-)

Anonymous said...

wow!
that was beautifully explained
looking forward to more such posts
thanks

ವೇಣುಗೋಪಾಲ ಕುಲ್ಕರ್ಣಿ, ಹೊಸಪೇಟೆ said...

Thank you Sindhuja. You have explained very well. You have a rare combination of good writing skills and nice music. My humble request to you is to explain each raaga you know and give them life with your voice. This will help people like us who are interested to learn and understand Indian music but stuck in some stupid western country. You make music more enjoyable.

Jessica Keyes said...

This article is very interesting and I enjoyed listening to your alap! I have a small tip on breathing technique that I can offer, which I picked up a while back from a saxophone clinician.

When you breathe in, it's quite audible and it sounds as though you're making the shape of the word "he" in your throat--fairly closed off. If you were to make the shape of the word "ho" in your throat as you breathe in you can take in much more air more quickly, and with less audible sound.

PS said...

beautiful alaap!
music is indeed not in the 7 notes but just in the mind.. same swara patterns with a different reference pitch create such a different mood.. magical!

my personal first encounter with grahabedham was purely by chance.. i was playing hindolam for a long time, and suddenly at a point of time, it started sounding to me like mohanam, all that happened was I had changed dha to sa. i continued playing with the pitch, and made ri as sa and it became suddha saveri..

just chanced upon this post on random surfing...

Ramya said...

Sindhu am loving this post.. I have not heard ur alaap fully... its so informative.. am doing lot of learning with this post n other stuff.. i want an alaap of karaharapriya from you.. please try to sing it sometime

ramya

Anonymous said...

Shruthi: In Western parlance, root and fifth (5th).

Sthaayi: In Western parlance, root-5th-octave.

Swara: In western parlance (if I'm reading this right), this is the basis for "equal" temperament. In a twelve-tone scale, the gradations from root to octave (X Hz to 2X Hz) follow in a geometric progression, in steps of X Hz + X^(#/12) Hz. So a major third would be X Hz + X^ (4/12) Hz, or X + X^ (1/3), or X^(4/3). Hope I got the math right there.

Shruthibhedam : If I read this right, this is analogous to what Westerners call the "key". So if we shift from the key of "C" (=261.626 Hz) to the key of "E" (329.628 Hz), all notes in that scale change accordingly.

Sindhuja-- We should really work on this; I really enjoy this sort of stuff.

-Mark-

The Practical Idealist said...

Sindhuja,

First off, kudos to your superb explanation. I am absolutely sure that it would appeal to science-positive minds, though I'm not too sure about its appeal to the artistic folks. Nevertheless, a very, very good write up.

I liked the way you started and expounded your aalaapanai, but the sanchaaram on the higher notes of Sriranjani was a bit unconventional. You probably did it merely to emphasise the transition into Hamsanaadham, but it sure sounded a bit unusual.

Again, I'm not an expert, only a listener with many hours of listening to the Masters...

Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam said...

Thanks a ton to each of you. Sorry for not acknowledging some of your comments posted ages ago.
@Practical Idealist: I now think the aalaap was an extremely amateur attempt :) Been wanting to redo it and post it sometime.
Mark: Thanks! We'll talk soon!

Anand said...

Hi Sinduja,

The alaap was literally divine..!! I have just started to understand Carnatic music. It would be great if you could give me a list of all the ragas (if possible) with the swaras and also with a little rendition of each of them. I know it would take a lot of your time but it would be great for people like me.

Thanks,
-Anand